Successful change initiatives are not just a matter of planning; they must be implemented as well. In most cases, the change implementation process comes with its own set of difficulties. Even the best made plans will experience problems as they are implemented.

Despite the experience of many organizations, it is possible to turn strategies and plans into individual actions, necessary to produce a great business performance. It’s not easy, however, and many companies repeatedly fail to truly motivate their people to work with enthusiasm, all together, towards the corporate aims. Most companies and organizations know their businesses, and the strategies required for success. However many corporations, especially large ones, struggle to translate the theory into action plans that will enable the strategy to be successfully implemented and sustained. I have listed some leading edge methods for effective strategic corporate implementation;
For example; Fortune Magazine study suggested that 70% of 10 CEOs who fail do so not because of a bad strategy, but because of bad execution (Why CEOs Fail, R Charan, Fortune Magazine). In another study of 200 companies in the Times 1000, 80% of directors said they had the right strategies but only 14% thought they were implementing them well, this could be linked to the finding that despite 97% of directors having a ‘strategic vision’, only 33% reported achieving ‘significant strategic success’. (Why do only one-third of UK companies achieve strategic success?, I Cobbold & G Lawrie).
The message is clear. Effective strategy realisation is key for achieving strategic success.
Some essential elements for strategic realisation are as follows;
- Motivational Leadership: concentrating on achieving sustained performance through personal growth, value-based relationships and planning that recognizes human dynamics
- Turning Strategy into Action: entails a phase approach, linking identified performance factors with strategic initiatives and projects designed to develop and optimise departmental and individual activities.
- Performance Management: involving the construction of organizational processes and capabilities necessary to achieve performance through people delivering results.

There are simple ways to judge whether your strategy realisation process is working:
- look for business results and progress on the delivery of targets and KPI’s
- look for signs that your people have really got the corporate message and have taken it to heart
- sadly, in many organizations the vast majority of staff do not understand the corporate aims, let alone see themselves as an integral part of the effort
- If your methods enable every person to know what they are doing, and why, and to be emotionally committed to it, then the process of turning strategy into action is probably working.

Plans for implementing a particular change are generally made with a great deal of thought given to all the possible problems that might arise so that adequate allowances and provisions can be made. When the unexpected problems invariably arise, those responsible for the planning as well as those responsible for the implementation are often at a loss about how to correct the problem or adjust the plan.
In some cases, those involved may put time and effort into making a guess about and implementing a possible solution just to find that things move even farther off course. At this point, organization members, who are already struggling to make the change, become even more unhappy and resistant, causing fear and frustration for those seeking a solution and reluctance to try again. Unanticipated problems that are not quickly solved can sabotage the entire change initiative.
In addition to unanticipated problems, many change initiatives require more resources of all kinds to implement than those that have been provided for in the plan. The implementation may take longer than expected. Re-education and training may be more involved than expected. Retooling costs may be higher than budgeted. The greater the investment of resources over time in the change initiative, the greater the anxiety about the wisdom or change in general. Those who were once cheerleaders may become less supportive and those who were against the change may become more negative.
Regardless of the nature of the issues that arise during the implementation, it is a sure bet that at some point during the process, some members of the organization or group will want to abandon the initiative and go back to “the way things were”. And it is at these points that having an external partner involved in the change implementation or having a relationship with an external resource can be extremely helpful.
Framework for Organizational Development: The Why, What & How of OD work. www.ufv.ca
Organizational Change & Development (Managing Change & Change Management). http://managementhelp.org/organizationalchange/
The Effective Implementation of Multi-Source Feedback Processes. http://armandojusto.blogspot.com